[qcc] Any sljit experience?

[Bruce Ewing]

I received a suggestion today that sljit might provide a better compiler
intermediate language (they call theirs a LIR) than TCG does. sljit has a
very similar set of backends that it supports for output. TCG is obviously
much more fully tested -- but at first glance, it looks like sljit may
produce much more optimized/efficient code. I think it's a lot smaller than
TCG, too, which I like. It may also require less modding to provide full
C99 functionality.

Maybe we should encourage the QEMU guys to dump TCG and adopt sljit, eh? :D

Thoughts?

http://sljit.sourceforge.net/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/qcc-landley.net/attachments/20150505/0c80a709/attachment.htm>