[Toybox] Fwd: [toybox] du for contribution

[Rob Landley]

On 08/27/2012 01:42 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:34:17 -0500 Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> 
>> I think the best way to do it is to make the basic implementation be
>> "the non-stupid bits of posix", and then an additional config symbol
>> should go beyond posix where applicable. (Or fill in the actively
>> stupid bits, like the full horror of xargs whitespace parsing which I
>> still haven't implemented yet both because it's kind of horrible and
>> because -0 renders it obsolete, but Rich Felker wants it, so it's on
>> my todo list.)
> 
> So these would be generic compile time config options for all of
> toybox?  Plain, sane, or insane respectively?

I was thinking attached to the specific commands, of which there are
currently something like 3 that would care.

I could put a "PEDANTIC" config option in the general menu, but the
problem is allyesconfig/allnoconfig. Adding an option that _disables_
functionality is backwards, and makes allyesconfig funky. But having an
option required for some functionality be separated way away from that
functionality is also funky.

Then again, TOYBOX_FLOAT is already doing that...

(There's also the fact it only really applies to posix. I don't care
much about following LSB closely since it's such a terrible standard,
and the android and other stuff doesn't really have a standard.)

Rob
-- 
GNU/Linux isn't: Linux=GPLv2, GNU=GPLv3+, they can't share code.
Either it's "mere aggregation", or a license violation.  Pick one.