[Toybox] [PATCH 1/1] add pathchk

[Ilya Kuzmich]

Could you publish this todo somehow?
Would be glad to help.
On 28/05, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 05/27/2017 02:39 PM, Ilya Kuzmich wrote:
> > No, i do not have use case for this.
> > 
> > I've implemented pathchk because it was on roadmap, had a decent spec
> > and was small enough to do in a couple of evenings.
> 
> Yeah, that's my fault. I should update the roadmap.
> 
> > I'm happy to contribute, but most of the stuff on the roadmap is either
> > huge or in pending.
> > 
> > I'm not sure i have enough time to do something big, and contributing to
> > pending is tricky: you have your reasons to keep stuff in pending but
> > they are not oblivious to me.
> > 
> > Because of that i choose to do pathck.
> 
> Unfortunately people asking how they can help are usually asking "is
> there something easy to do that you haven't already done". Hard question
> for me to answer.
> 
> I have eight gazillion todo items, such as "figure out why top eats so
> much cpu" and "now that zcat's in I should implement zgrep" with a note
> asking if I should just make the normal grep autodetect gzipped input
> from the header signature, or add a -z flag to it", and "should I add
> mtd-utils or ubi-utils stuff", "add df -i"... those seem the easiest for
> somebody else to tackle? (Although the zgrep one has a design question
> in it.)
> 
> Rob