[Toybox] [PATCH] (gzipped patch due to size) Remove large amount of auto-generated test cases for bc
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Fri Mar 1 16:40:35 PST 2024
On 3/1/24 00:37, Oliver Webb via Toybox wrote:
> Heya, Was trying to not bother the list on Feb 29th because 0.9 (0.8.11?) was supposed to come out,
I didn't manage it. I wound up tangenting through optarg.c instead, and I still
haven't done a proper lib/passwd.c test setup (the new infrastructure caused
regressions, I un-promoted a command I really want to promote again), and so on.
Going through the git log to assemble release notes tends to find loose ends...
Also I'm packing so I can sell my house and move (my wife got her doctorate so
she's probably moving for a job, dunno where yet). I was trying to get out a
release _before_ the storage pod arrived and box wrangling became more urgent.
(The old "important vs urgent" scale...)
> And I didn't wanna delay it with things like bc cleanup.
...
> This patch removes a lot of stuff, and is therefore way too large to get through the spam filter in it's plain form.
> Since if It gets caught in it no one on the list can see it besides rob. I've compressed the patch with gzip -9.
> (Only people that can decompress the patch seeing it is better then _noone_ being able to unless it gets applied).
> I've never delt with a patch this large, and it cant be broken up easily (parse.txt cleanup is 90% of it), so this seemed
> like the best solution. The patch is about 180k uncompressed
Applied.
In theory git has extended patch formats that can rename files, and I _think_
can also delete them without saying what the old contents was, but alas the
documentation is terrible and "git format-patch" does not by default PRODUCE the
stuff that "git am" can understand. (You need to add -M for the move ones, and
even then it didn't do it reliably for me and I wound up editing them by hand...)
Rob
More information about the Toybox
mailing list