From piotr.karbowski at gmail.com Sun Jun 19 14:27:43 2016 From: piotr.karbowski at gmail.com (KARBOWSKI Piotr) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:27:43 +0200 Subject: [Aboriginal] How about ash instead of hush? Message-ID: Hi Landley, List, I am utilizing aboriginal as an sysroot+sdk for building static tools for the initramfs purposes. So far I have been using only the 1.2.0 version, which was still based on uClibc. Right now I do another try to switch to the one with musl and I hit a wall with the /bin/sh. busybox's hush is used as the /bin/sh. The hush does not support `readonly`, `command`, or even `set -e` which I was sure is the POSIX SH thingy. Would it be okey to switch to ash in the new aboriginal? Or ship ash as dependency (I can alter the /bin/sh symlink on my side). I would be happy to send merge request with the needed changes. -- Piotr.