[Aboriginal] Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.
slyich at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 10:55:16 PST 2011
> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gentoo.org>
Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Aboriginal