[Toybox] Editors and such.

[Roy Tam]

2012/6/17 David Seikel <onefang at gmail.com>:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:20:12 +0800 Roy Tam <roytam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2012/6/17 David Seikel <onefang at gmail.com>:
>> > On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:14:34 +0800 Roy Tam <roytam at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Sat Jun 16 08:47:05 PDT 2012 David Seikel
>> >> <onefang at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:20:11 +1000 David Seikel
>> >> ><onefang at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Then there would be a toy I'm calling toyboxes.
>> >> >
>> >> >Hmm, seems toybox does not like toy names that partially match the
>> >> >names of other toys.  Every time I try to use "toyboxes", it finds
>> >> >"toybox" instead.
>> >>
>> >> why not use "boxes" as the name?
>> >
>> > That's exactly what I did, and that worked fine.  Still, shows
>> > there's a problem in toybox.  The name "toyboxes" failed, coz it
>> > got confused with "toybox", the name "boxes" worked.  I can't think
>> > off the top of my head of any other cases where a command we might
>> > want to support has it's name being a subset of the name of some
>> > other command we might want to support, but it could happen.
>> >
>> >> maybe we can have a simplified GNU SCREEN with it? ;-)
>> >
>> > Does GNU own screen?  Careful with such assumptions around here.
>>
>> Yes they did.
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/
>
> It's hosted there, but I don't think they own it.

even wikipedia says so, although the developer names can also be found
in the article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Screen

>
> --
> A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
> coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Toybox mailing list
> Toybox at lists.landley.net
> http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
>

 1339981209.0