[Toybox] [RFC] ktls is in 4.13.

[Robert Thompson]

>From the toybox point of view, wouldn't this introduce direct link
dependency on ssl/tls libraries?

If that's acceptable, the ktls stuff looks like a simple addition (on top
of base in-toybox tls) with potential performance improvements, once the
code settles down.


On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:

> The kernel just merged "ssl renamed after thread local storage" support:
>
>   vpaper: https://netdevconf.org/1.2/papers/ktls.pdf
>   sample code: https://github.com/ktls/af_ktls
>
> It's basic https plumbing in the kernel, but doesn't do the handshake or
> renegotiation. What I'm wondering is would this be a better thing to try
> to plug into than the openssl command line utility?
>
> Worth bothering with?
>
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> Toybox mailing list
> Toybox at lists.landley.net
> http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/attachments/20170904/a073e1a0/attachment.htm>